EU Weighs Response to Trump’s Tariff Threat Over Greenland
8 hours ago
Nick Beake, Europe Correspondent, in Brussels
Donald Trump has emphasized that Greenland is crucial for U.S. security, even suggesting the possibility of seizing it by force. Less than a year into his second term, European leaders find themselves on a precarious rollercoaster ride. The U.S. President is imposing threats of economic repercussion against nations supporting the territorial integrity of Denmark, an EU member. In response, leaders are convening for an emergency EU summit in the coming days.
The Dilemma Facing the EU
– Trade War Risks: If the European Union retaliates with similar countermeasures, it could trigger a full-blown trade war with the United States. Conversely, failing to act may lead Trump to perceive the bloc of 27 as weak, divided, and hesitant to counter his threats regarding Greenland—whether through purchase or military action.
– Macron’s Call to Action: French President Emmanuel Macron advocates for utilizing the EU’s trade bazooka for the first time—the Anti-Coercion Instrument (ACI). This strategy would empower Europe to:
– Implement counter-tariffs
– Restrict access to the Single Market
– Block applications for lucrative EU contracts
Ironically, this measure was initially crafted to counter external coercion, with China as the primary concern, not the U.S.
Diverging Perspectives Among EU Leaders
Not all EU leaders are eager to adopt Macron’s aggressive stance. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who has maintained a positive rapport with Trump, has remarked on potential issues concerning understanding and communication regarding recent troop deployments to Greenland by several European nations, including Denmark. While she did not elaborate, her comments suggest a desire for a more diplomatic dialogue in addressing this EU-U.S. crisis.
The troop movements aimed to reassure Trump of Europe’s commitment to Arctic security but appear to have only intensified his threats.
The Urgency of the Situation
Sunday’s emergency meeting of EU ambassadors in Brussels was understated, contrasting sharply with the bustling atmosphere of typical high-profile summits where leaders are captured by cameras and attention. The next move remains uncertain, as it’s unclear whether Trump might ease his threats or escalate them further.
Conclusions on EU’s Position
A swift and unified EU response to such a sensitive matter appears unlikely. Traditionally, Europe has attempted to appease Trump during his second term, garnering mixed opinions; some have termed it strategic, while others see it as obsequious. However, there is a growing concern that Trump is not simply raising the diplomatic drawbridge but may be threatening to destroy it entirely.
Danish Prime Minister’s assertion that Europe won’t be blackmailed underscores the tension of this evolving situation, highlighting the need for a coordinated and effective response in light of Trump’s Greenland threats.